Connect with us

Opinion

Pennsylvania school board member tells parents ‘I don’t work for you’

Published

on

One Pennsylvania college board member has a message for fogeys: “No, I don’t be just right for you.”

York Suburban Faculty District college board member Richard Robinson wrote an op-ed within the York Dispatch explaining his declare.

Robinson wrote that native college boards require a public remark alternative for fogeys and different members of the neighborhood to voice their opinions about points associated to highschool, however there was a serious shift lately.

“This provision offers residents of a faculty district the prospect to vent their spleens about exorbitant taxes or demand topics be taught correctly the way in which they have been throughout probably the most frigid interval of the Chilly Warfare. Previously, most of the time, no one confirmed up,” Robinson stated. “Not nowadays. As social media shops, nationwide information broadcasts and our native newspapers inform us, college boards at the moment are the brand new battleground within the combat for America’s future.”

FAIRFAX COUNTY PARENTS DEMAND SCHOOL BOARD RESIGN AFTER ‘DOUBLING DOWN’ ON ‘PORN IN SCHOOLS’

York Suburban Excessive Faculty 
(Google Maps)

Robinson wrote that some members of the neighborhood interpret the general public remark portion of faculty board conferences to indicate “why they’ve the collective intelligence of a village fool.”

“Some members of my neighborhood seem to interpret this a part of board conferences because the event to inform board members why they’ve the collective intelligence of a village fool and the way the college district should be addressing actual issues,” the college board member wrote.

Robinson’s essay drew a response from Nicole Neily, president of Mother and father Defending Training, who informed Fox Information Digital that the college board member was mocking mother and father.

“Far too many elected officers have proven over the previous two years that the ‘consent of the ruled’ is little greater than an inconvenient pace bump on the street to advancing their unpopular agendas,” Neily stated. “Mocking and dismissing the issues of the neighborhood could also be cathartic for petty dictators, however it’s not a path to electoral success.”

“Mocking and dismissing the issues of the neighborhood could also be cathartic for petty dictators, however it’s not a path to electoral success.”

— Nicole Neily, president, Mother and father Defending Training

Parents Defending Education co-founder Nicole Neily speaking at parents' rally on Capitol Hill, Nov. 16, 2021

Mother and father Defending Training co-founder Nicole Neily talking at mother and father’ rally on Capitol Hill, Nov. 16, 2021

In his op-ed, the college board member additionally shared a few of his “positions” and stated that he doesn’t “work” for taxpayers.

“With all due respect to the women and men who snarl, ‘I’m a taxpayer! You’re employed for me!’ No, I don’t be just right for you. I used to be elected by individuals who voted to signify you,” Robinson wrote.

Within the checklist of “positions” written, Robinson additionally states that oldsters don’t “at all times” know what’s finest for his or her little one.

POLITICO RECEIVES BLOWBACK AFTER WARNING THAT REPUBLICANS ARE ‘MAKING SCHOOL BOARD RACES PARTISAN’

York Suburban School District school board meeting.

York Suburban Faculty District college board assembly.

“‘Don’t mother and father at all times know what’s finest for his or her little one?’ No, we don’t. However, if you’re offended as a result of I don’t consider mother and father are infallible, you’ll be able to at all times sue or take your little one out of faculty. Your alternative,” Robinson wrote.

“If you’re offended as a result of I don’t consider mother and father are infallible, you’ll be able to at all times sue or take your little one out of faculty. Your alternative.”

— Richard Robinson, York Suburban college board

Robinson additionally wrote that oldsters who declare that “well being and security measures” are damaging youngsters’s psychological well being to “justify their very own social agenda” are “probably the most offensive and vile of all.”

“To hearken to your repeated distortions of the information is nauseating.”

— Richard Robinson, York Suburban college board

“Lastly, with all due respect to the charlatans who declare well being and security measures are liable for destroying the psychological well being of kids merely to justify their very own social agenda, you’re the most offensive and vile of all,” Robinson writes.

“There are members of this neighborhood who tried to attract consideration to the warning indicators of accelerating psychological misery amongst our kids lengthy earlier than you ever considered psychological well being as a possible cudgel. To hearken to your repeated distortions of the information is nauseating.”